The Nintendo Switch 2 is the company’s least ambitious console to date, but its improvements are astronomical

Now you’re playing with power

Nintendo Switch 2

Verdict

The Nintendo Switch 2 is an apt name for the company’s latest console, as it is essentially a more powerful version of its predecessor. What’s impressive, though, is just how much of an improvement over the original Switch it is. With support for 4K and 1440p resolutions as well as 120Hz in both docked and handheld play, Nintendo has successfully played catch-up with other contemporary consoles. Its 1080p vivid LCD screen is also immaculate, displaying titles with a clarity that you rarely see from other gaming handhelds. Battery life is a downgrade, however, and paired with some Bluetooth audio issues and a handful of issues with other features, there are definitely some teething issues at launch.

Pros

  • +Premium build
  • +Gorgeous, vivid 1080p LCD display
  • +Blissfully smooth UI/UX
  • +A notable step up in game performance from its predecessor
  • +Excellent backward compatibility breathes new life into old games

Cons

  • -Terrible handheld battery life
  • -Bluetooth audio has a significant delay
  • -Uninspired user interface
  • -Tiny launch game roster largely made up of ports
  • -GameChat is neat, but needs work

>>>KTR-003 Battery for Nintendo 3DS N3DS

Nintendo Switch 2: two-minute review

After what felt like an eternity of waiting after all the leaks and eventual official announcement back in January 2025, the Nintendo Switch 2 is finally here. To say the console’s had a rough start is an understatement, though, with retail stock difficulty to come by at this early stage. This, plus the console’s relatively lofty price tag (as well as those of its games), means there are some folks seeking handheld gaming console alternatives.

At the time of writing, I’ve had my Nintendo Switch 2 a couple of weeks, and I’ve been spending each and every day playing its games and testing the hardware to rate its performance and assess any improvements over the original 2017 console. Despite the lack of ambition and innovation (at least compared to prior consoles like the Wii and Nintendo DS), I think Nintendo has produced an exceptional system here that finally realizes the full potential of theSwitchconcept.

The obvious upgrades, such as support for4Kand 1440p resolutions in docked mode and 120Hz capabilities (both in portable mode and docked on compatible displays) are extremely welcome, and grant the Switch 2 a step closer to parity with its more powerful peers in thePS5andXbox Series Xand S. Of course, the Switch 2 doesn’t quite have the raw graphical prowess of those Sony and Microsoft-built machines, but it’s not a million miles away, as we see with certain Nintendo Switch 2 ports likeStreet Fighter 6orCyberpunk 2077.

Nintendo Switch 2

Other display-oriented modernities are present here, too, such as HDR10 and VRR support (though, confusingly, variable refresh rate is currently only available in handheld play). The former provides juicier contrast and richer colors on compatible displays, while the latter smooths out framerates for more stable performance.

Unfortunately, it’s fair to say that the Switch 2’s launch game line-up is on the slighter side.Mario Kart Worldis great and an ideal title to have from day one, but a good chunk of launch day games have been ports of original Switch games or ones carried over from other platforms. While it is great to see big hitters likeThe Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdomrock an extremely solid 4K/60fps on Switch 2, it hasn’t been the most fulsome launch if you’re coming at it from a strictly first-party point of view.

Thankfully, the Switch 2 breathes life into original Switch titles via impressive backwards compatibility. I’ll delve more into this in its own section, but I’ve seen monumental results playing some of my own Switch favorites on the new console – some of which Nintendo itself hasn’t even officially mentioned.

There are some downsides worth talking about, of course. For one, battery life is sorely lacking in handheld mode and feels like an abject downgrade compared to the original Switch models. I also clocked some very noticeable audio delay with multiple gaming headsets and earbuds via Bluetooth connection. Furthermore, the skeleton of the original Switch is still present in many ways, with an almost identical Home dashboard, a lack of customization, and the ongoing threat of drift prevailing in the new Joy-Con 2 controllers.

Still, the Switch 2 is an accomplished bit of kit, and one that provides a night and day upgrade over its eight-year-old predecessor. I’m definitely looking forward to its game library expanding, as well as the system itself receiving various quality-of-life upgrades via future firmware updates.

>>>HAC-006 Battery for Nintendo Switch Joy-Con Fits HAC-006 Left Right

Nintendo Switch 2: price and availability

Nintendo Switch 2

The Nintendo Switch 2 went on sale on June 5, 2025. The console by itself costs $449.99 / £395.99 / AU$699.95. There is also an official bundle that packs in a digital copy ofMarioKart Worldalongside the console for $499.99 / £429.99 / AU$769.95. Some US and UK retailers have also stocked their own bundles, often throwing in an extra pair of Joy-Con 2 controllers orNintendo Switch Onlinesubscription time, but you can expect to pay a premium for these.

Price-wise, though, the Nintendo Switch 2 (while certainly more expensive than its predecessor) falls about in line with similar contemporary handheld gaming devices, including the original Steam Deck ($399 / £349 / AU$649) and theAsus ROG Ally($549.99 / £449 / AU$999). Premium devices like theSteam Deck OLEDandROG Ally Xare even more expensive, positioning the Switch 2 at a relatively mid-range price point among gaming handhelds, but certainly on the more affordable side within the space.

In terms of home consoles, the Switch 2 does come in cheaper than the PS5 ($499.99 / £479.99 / AU$799.95) and lands in the same ballpark as the PS5 Digital Edition ($399.99 / £389.99 / AU$649.95). It’s also comparable in price to theXbox Series X Digital Edition($449.99 / £429.99 / AU$699).

It’s also worth noting that Nintendo Switch 2 stock has been an ongoing issue since the pre-order phase. At launch, it’s been incredibly difficult to purchase a Switch 2 at retail, and flashes of stock in all major regions come and go in an instant. However, this was also the case with the original Switch and competing systems like the PS5. In both cases, stock became much more plentiful in the months after launch, so I’m hoping the same is true for Nintendo’s latest.

>>>CTR-003 Battery for Nintendo Switch NS Pro Wiiu 3DS 2DS

Nintendo Switch 2: specs

Price$429.99 / £395.99 / AU$699.95
Weight1.18lbs / 535g (with Joy-Con 2 attached)
Dimensions10.7 x 4.5 x 0.6in / 272 x 114 x 15mm
Storage capacity256GB internal
Storage expansionmicroSD Express
ConnectivityWiFi 6, ethernet, Bluetooth
DisplayVivid LCD
Resolution (docked)Up to 4K
Resolution (handheld)Up to 1080p
GPUCustom Nvidia processor
CPUCustom Nvidia processor
Battery life2-5 hours
Ports2 x USB, 1 x HDMI, 1 x LAN, 2 x USB-C, 1 x 3.5mm headphone jack

Nintendo Switch 2: design and build qualityNintendo Switch 2

What’s most striking about the Nintendo Switch 2 out of the box is its look and build quality improvements over its predecessor. The console looks distinctly less toy-like, largely helped by an overall sleeker design and the ditching of the original Joy-Con’s neon red/blue aesthetic.

Some may lament the loss of whimsy, and that’s fair enough. But it nonetheless stands out amongst the busy gaming handheld crowd. The Switch 2, despite its increased size, remains impressively slim. In fact, it’s just as thin as the original Switch, and importantly, lacks the bulk of the likes of the Steam DeckOLEDand ROG Ally X. This means that even though it is bigger thanks to the larger display size, it remains an eminently portable console.

Though I would recommend investing in a carry case if you’re planning on taking your Switch 2 out and about. While it’s undoubtedly sturdier than the Switch, it’s still prone to the same environmental wear and tear of any handheld system.

The Switch 2 dock has also seen a size increase, but for good reason. This time, the dock houses an internal fan to help keep the unit cool during lengthy play sessions. Thankfully, the dock is still small enough to fit into even the most compact gaming spaces. Whether that be on a TV stand or your computer desk, or elsewhere, you should have little issue incorporating your Switch 2 into a docked setup. The dock also houses two USB ports, one ethernet port, and a HDMI slot for use on TVs or gaming monitors.

Nintendo Switch 2

As for the handheld itself, there’s a lot to go over in terms of design. The unit now houses two USB-C ports – one on the top and the other at the bottom. Next to each port are sets of speakers. At the top, you’ll also find the power and volume buttons, as well as the game card slot, 3.5mm headphone jack, and a built-in microphone.

The Switch 2’s kickstand is a huge improvement. The 2017 model had a simple stub kickstand on one side, which felt extremely rigid. TheSwitch OLEDdid widen this design idea, but it wasn’t much better overall. On Switch 2, the kickstand has been entirely redesigned. It spans almost the entire length of the handheld and can be rotated to a much greater degree. This allows for greater freedom with how you place your Switch 2 on a surface for tabletop play.

Another massive improvement comes in how the Joy-Con 2 controllers attach to the handheld. Instead of the original Switch’s rigid rail system, the Switch 2 opts for a magnetic connection. As such, the Joy-Con 2 click into place seamlessly and instantaneously. You can also easily pop them back out by pushing in a button housed just underneath the ZL/ZR trigger buttons.

One last thing to note is that the Switch 2 is impressively lightweight. At just 1.18lbs (535g), it’s only marginally heavier than the original Switch, which was 0.88lbs (399g), and the Switch OLED’s 0.93lbs (422g). Admittedly, I was expecting something much heavier before my hands-on preview some months ago, but I remain pleasantly surprised by the Switch 2’s slimness. And when compared to the bulkier Steam Deck OLED’s 1.41lbs (640g), playing with Switch 2 in bed or on the go is less strenuous overall.

Nintendo Switch 2: displayNintendo Switch 2

I have no complaints when it comes to the Switch 2’s display. It is a monumental upgrade over the original’s 720p LCD screen.

Unlike the namesake screen of the Switch OLED, Nintendo has opted for an LCD display for the Switch 2. This may come across as a downgrade on paper, but in reality, the move back to LCD has its own advantages. For one, LCD is less prone to screen burn-in than OLED, allowing for a panel that should last longer.

Furthermore, Nintendo has still managed to ensure that your games still look crisp and vividly colorful during portable play. Nintendo describes its display as ‘Vivid LCD,’ and it’s an accurate description to say the least. The display supports HDR10, meaning games that support this screen tech (likeSuper Mario Odysseyand the upcomingMetroid Prime 4: Beyond) can be just as eye-poppingly colorful on the handheld as they would be on a larger OLED panel.

This 1080p screen also supports VRR (variable refresh rate), helping demanding games maintain a smooth framerate and helping 120Hz-compatible titles meet that target. At launch, there aren’t many games that benefit from the Switch 2 screen’s 120Hz capability, thoughMetroid Prime 4: Beyondis confirmed to have a 1080p performance mode that targets this high refresh rate. It’s bound to look stunning on the handheld that already has a native 1080p resolution.

Of course, there will be times when you won’t want to make use of HDR10, perhaps in order to save battery or to have a play experience that’s less demanding on the eyes. Nintendo has thankfully thought of this, and there are options in the settings menu to disableHDRentirely or to only enable it for true HDR-compatible games.

In my testing, I have no complaints when it comes to the Switch 2’s display. It is a monumental upgrade over the original’s 720p LCD screen. The jump to 1080p helps both Switch 2 and OG Switch games look incredibly sharp. Even titles that utilize a dynamic resolution in handheld mode – likeBayonetta 3andAstral Chain– are better able to meet this target thanks to the increased power of the Switch 2.

Nintendo Switch 2: user interface and settings

Nintendo Switch 2The Switch 2’s Home dashboard is a disappointment at first glance. In fact, you might not be able to tell it apart from the original console’s menu if it weren’t for the rounded edges applied to game icons on the Switch 2. It’s still aggressively bland, then, and you’ve still only got the choice between two basic white and black themes, but there have been some key improvements worth talking about.

The big thing to make note of is performance. Issues with the glacial input delay are practically nonexistent now, and nowhere is this more apparent than the revamped Nintendo eShop. There’s a completely new user interface here, and items are organized much more cleanly and smartly than before. And while, yes, you still won’t be escaping the mountains of genAI shovelware when looking through the deals section, I’d still argue that the eShop now is a good deal more responsive than even the PlayStation andMicrosoftStores.

Over to System Settings, then, and you’ll find much of what was available on the original Switch. On Switch 2, there are plenty more options to take advantage of the hardware’s new features. These include setting TV output to 1440p or 4K, fine-tuning HDR, as well as preventing your system from topping up its battery all the way to full in order to help the battery last longer in the years to come. A similar option is common with best iPhones and best Android smartphones, so it’s nice to see it here on a portable gaming device.

Nintendo Switch 2: audio

Nintendo Switch 2

One important addition to the Nintendo Switch 2 is the implementation of a bespoke surround sound system, supported by the speakers on both the top and bottom of the handheld.

What impressed me the most here was the surprising level of audio quality when not using a pair of headphones in handheld mode. The speakers are significantly less tinny than the original Switch (though that did also see an improvement with the OLED model), and they provide surprisingly clear audio for such a compact device.

The speakers work great for a wide range of games, whether that’s the vast immersive soundscape ofTheLegend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdomor the infectiously catchy tunes ofSplatoon 3.Even older NES and SNES games that are playable via Nintendo Switch Online benefit, with their simpler melodies coming through with great clarity.

Bluetooth support is where the Switch 2 falters in the audio department. Don’t get me wrong, you’re still getting strong surround sound support here. But with the gaming headsets and earbuds I tested – including theRIG 900 Max HSand theNothing Ear (a)earbuds – there was a very noticeable audio delay of around half a second. This was the case in both docked and handheld modes, though it was certainly more pronounced with the latter.

On that note, I’d recommend hooking up a pair of wired headphones via the 3.5mm jack. In this case, I tested myRazer BlackShark V2headphones, and audio came through crystal clear without a hint of delay.

Nintendo Switch 2: Performance

Nintendo Switch 2

Now, overall gaming performance is where the Nintendo Switch 2 really impresses. At least at this early stage in the console’s life, the notion of poor framerates and heavily compromised Nintendo Switch ports seems to be a thing of the past.

Nintendo’s own output has thus far been stellar on this front.Mario Kart Worldruns at a clean 1440p while docked (1080p on the handheld) at a solid 60 frames per second (fps) at all times. That’s especially impressive given the series’ shift to a vibrant open world.

However, I was even more surprised by some of the console’s ports.Street Fighter 6,for example (while slightly worse off in terms of image quality with some noticeable graining), runs superbly at 60fps both online and offline. The marquee single-player World Tour mode does take some hits with battles being locked to 30fps, but that’s the only real blemish on this otherwise exceptional port.

The one major downside to all this is the Switch 2’s shockingly poor battery life. In handheld mode, Nintendo itself estimates that you can get anywhere between two to six and a half hours. However, in all my testing, I simply didn’t find this to be the case. Of course, more demanding titles will drain the battery a good deal more, but even with original Switch games, I struggled to get more than three hours at full charge. And yes, that’s even after bypassing the bug where the console thinks it’s got around 10% less battery life than what it actually has.

Even when playing less demanding titles, such as side-scrollers or Nintendo Switch Online (NSO) retro games, battery life struggles. You can, of course, mitigate things by turning down the console’s brightness and disabling HDR for certain games, but this does come at the cost of overall image clarity.

I’d say, at a push, you can get around five hours tops with less visually demanding games, after testing titles likeHollow Knight, Puyo Puyo Tetris 2S,and numerous Switch Online classic titles. Heck, even idling on the Home dashboard seems to drain the battery at an alarming clip, so do make sure to keep your console in standby when you’re out and about and it’s not in use.

Nintendo Switch 2: Backwards compatibility

Switch 2 GameCube Controller

Nintendo Switch 2’s backwards compatibility is – in a word – excellent. Particularly when it comes to running and playing original Switch games. Firstly, most Switch games at a baseline level benefit from Switch 2’s faster internal storage. That means you can expect games to boot and load scenes much faster on average.

For example, bootingXenoblade Chronicles X: Definitive Editiontook me from the Home dashboard to the in-game menu in around 4 seconds. Then, from the menu to in-game was roughly 10 seconds. It’s a similar story withSuper Smash Bros. Ultimate,which loads into a match in literally less than 3 seconds. Another standout example isHyrule Warriors: Definitive Edition,which I’ve already written about as being one of my favorite Switch 2 experiences so far, despite being an original Switch title. In the main story mode, the game transitioned from level selection to loading to gameplay in, again, around 3 or 4 seconds.

Many Switch games also benefit from an increase in image quality and overall performance, not just games that have received paid Nintendo Switch 2 Editions. The standout example here isPokémon Scarlet and Violet.Most would agree that the original Switch release was a mess, with horrific image quality and choppy animations. On Switch 2, the game has been transformed, rocking a solid 60fps and targeting 4K while docked and 1080p on the handheld. Now, the game’s overall art style still does feel a bit flat, but with its key performance issues solved on Switch 2, it’s now well worth playing, as it’s still a fine Pokémon adventure.

Another game that benefits is, again,Hyrule Warriors: Definitive Edition.That game originally had an uncapped framerate, meaning the Switch 2 is able to brute force a 60fps performance at all times. Image quality in handheld mode is also sublime, with the game sporting a 1080p output and no longer needing to downsample to 720p to fit the original Switch display. If you know of any other OG Switch titles with uncapped framerates, definitely give them a try on Switch 2, as the results may surprise you.

Nintendo Switch 2: Joy-Con 2

Nintendo Switch 2

Now onto the Switch 2’s pack-in controllers – the Joy-Con 2. And again, we find a pretty sizable improvement over the previous model in some ways. Their overall design is much sleeker, and they’re slightly rounder than the original Joy-Con controllers. Their larger size also makes them much more comfortable to play with for longer sessions – even when sharing an individual Joy-Con 2 with a pal for co-op play.

The big addition here is mouse controls, which are supported by certain titles, includingCivilization 7andCyberpunk 2077.Mouse controls can also be used to navigate the Switch 2’s Home dashboard and Nintendo eShop (though the lack of a scroll wheel does hurt things a little here). It’s a very smart implementation, and performance is extremely smooth with no unnecessary acceleration. You can even adjust mouse sensitivity in the System Settings menu and in supported games.

It is worth mentioning that there have already been reports of Joy-Con 2 controllers suffering from stick drift, and the sticks themselves appear to have the same design as the originals.

This is a huge shame and a big disappointment, as one of my biggest concerns before launch was the lack of improvements in this regard. Nintendo does offer a free repair and replacement service for Joy-Con 2 controllers suffering from stick drift, but I’d obviously prefer a Hall effect solution in order to avoid this issue entirely.

Nintendo Switch 2: GameChatNintendo Switch 2

Finally, Nintendo has a true party voice chat solution built into one of its consoles. While numerous titles on the original Switch supported voice chat via the official Nintendo Switch Online app, chatting with friends this way was nothing short of awful – often thanks to forced disconnections between matches and low-quality audio.

So, is GameChat a decent alternative to the likes of Discord? Well, yes and no. GameChat obviously takes great inspiration from the world’s leading group chat software. Audio quality via the Switch 2’s built-in mic is surprisingly clear, and headset microphones are also supported. It is objectively a big improvement over Nintendo’s prior efforts.

The problems come with its implementation. Namely, shrinking the game screen down in order to display your friends’ Switch 2 profile icons. This seems needless, especially when not using the Nintendo Switch 2 Camera accessory, not to mention the fact that GameChat adds massive black borders around your game screen. Discord already solved this with its simple and effective overlay that maintains image resolution while displaying profile icons off to the side in a semi-transparent manner.

GameChat isn’t lacking ambition, though, and there are some neat ideas here. For example, being able to see your friends’ game screens is a novel idea, and a neat way of translating split-screen play in an online space. The problem, again, is the execution of it. Your friends’ displays are rendered at an uncomfortably low framerate, to the point where it can actually be quite distracting.

I hope Nintendo continues to improve the GameChat service going forward and flesh it out with more customizable options, because it is a handy thing to have for party chat with friends online, and it does have some neat ideas of its own. But for now, I would still recommend setting up a chat with friends via Discord.

Should I buy the Nintendo Switch 2?

Buy it if…

You want a night and day upgrade over the original Switch
Simply put, the Nintendo Switch 2 is the Switch’s vision fully realized. An astronomical performance improvement, paired with superb load times and a crisp 1080p display, arguably makes it the definitive gaming handheld.

You already have a decent-sized Switch game collection
Your original Switch games play better than ever on Switch 2. While not all benefit from image quality and performance improvements, those that do have never been better. Plus, most games do benefit from the console’s snappier load times.

You want a handheld gaming device that’s genuinely portable
While larger than the original Switch, it remains just as thin. If you’re put off by the bulk of the Steam Deck in particular, then the Switch 2 is an excellent portable alternative if you like to game while out and about.

Don’t buy it if…

You’re waiting on more first-party games
Nintendo’s own launch roster for the Switch 2 is very slim. IfMario Kart Worldisn’t your bag, and you’re not too keen on playing some of these Switch 2 Edition games again, I’d say it’s best to hold off until the game library improves.

You want a gaming handheld that’ll go the distance, battery-wise
The Switch 2’s battery life is incredibly poor. And while battery packs do exist to extend portable playtime, these do have the unfortunate side effect of bulking up the console. If you’re a frequent flyer or regularly find yourself on long commutes, the Switch 2’s battery life might let you down.

SOME EUROPEAN COUNTRIES ARE DITCHING MICROSOFT SOFTWARE FOR GOOD (AND HERE’S WHY THAT MATTERS)

Laptop with icons from Microsoft Office 365

A few European countries are quietly changing how they do business: moving away from Microsoft software in favor of open-source alternatives. While there are plenty of individuals who’ve made the switch from Windows to Mac or Linux, ditching Microsoft software along the way, the tech giant has been a mainstay in many offices around the world for the better part of three decades. That’s why it’s so surprising some European countries have decided to upend the status quo and walk away from the decades-old standard. For many, it’s as much a political and strategic decision as it is a technical one.

Denmark is the most prominent example of the changes that are underway, with its Ministry of Digital Affairs set to phase out Windows and Office 365 by November 2025, replacing them with Linux and LibreOffice. The Ministry’s decision builds on earlier efforts by the country’s two largest cities, Copenhagen and Aarhus, which had already announced plans to limit their reliance on Microsoft software. If you’re wondering what’s behind the sudden shift, it’s a desire for digital sovereignty. Denmark and the other European countries making similar moves want to reduce their dependence on foreign tech firms.

>>>G3HTA071H Battery for Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 1964

These are the European governments ditching Microsoft

Denmark isn’t alone in its push to move away from Microsoft tools in the public sector. Shortly after Denmark revealed its decision to transition away from Microsoft products, Germany’s northern state of Schleswig‑Holstein said it would stop using Microsoft Teams, Word, Excel, Outlook, and eventually Windows in government offices. The transition to a Microsoft-free workplace is expected to affect around 30,000 public-sector employees, including civil servants, police, and judges, who will switch to Linux, LibreOffice, Open‑Xchange, Nextcloud, and Thunderbird. Schleswig‑Holstein’s Digitalization Minister Dirk Schroeder didn’t mince words when he told AFP, “We’re done with Teams!” He cited digital sovereignty and a desire to “take back control” of how the state’s data is stored and managed.

The debate over Microsoft 365 vs. Office 2024 might matter to individual users, but for many European governments, the bigger question is whether to use Microsoft software at all. France was one of the first countries to act on that question. In November 2022, the Ministry of National Education advised against the use of free versions of Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace in public schools. Officials cited concerns over compliance with the EU’s strict data privacy law, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and the risks posed by the U.S. Cloud Act, which requires U.S.-based companies to turn over data even if it’s stored abroad. Instead of enforcing a hard ban, officials urged schools to use on-premise or EU-hosted solutions that comply with European data-protection requirements.

While some regions, like Spain’s Valencia, made large-scale moves to LibreOffice as early as 2012, primarily to cut costs and avoid vendor lock-in, others have framed the shift more strategically. In 2015, Italy’s Ministry of Defence adopted LibreOffice and the Open Document Format (ODF) on over 100,000 systems as part of a long-term plan to ensure autonomy over public-sector data and document standards.

>>>G3HTA056H Battery for Microsoft Surface Pro X 13″ Tablet

Why this shift away from Microsoft matters

At first glance, these moves by European countries may seem like nothing more than a symbolic gesture or bureaucratic reshuffle. In reality, they reflect a deeper shift toward asserting control over digital infrastructure and reducing reliance on foreign tech giants. Many of the countries that have chosen to transition away from Microsoft software have been explicit: this transition is a powerful move towards establishing digital sovereignty. For many European countries, digital sovereignty means keeping critical infrastructure and data out of the hands of foreign tech firms.

Just like you should change some Google settings immediately if you’re worried about privacy, European governments have decided to perform a reset on their relationship with big tech, starting with how they manage software, data, and control. One of the biggest motivators is geopolitical independence. As Europe becomes concerned about its overexposure to U.S. tech companies, like Microsoft, Google, and Amazon, some countries have begun taking concrete steps toward limiting their reliance on U.S. providers. A side benefit is that by replacing Microsoft, European countries stand to save money through the elimination of recurring license fees.

According to some estimates, Germany’s Schleswig-Holstein state could see several million euros in savings over the next few years. While it’s still early, if more countries follow suit, it could disrupt the current global tech order and force companies like Microsoft to rethink how they work with public-sector clients outside the U.S.

5 Nintendo Switch 2 settings I recommend changing as soon as you boot your new console up

Before you lock in, lock down those settings

A Nintendo Switch 2 console with the controllers removed

There’s nothing quite like the excitement of a new console; feverishly whipping off the packaging, setting up your user account, and loading up your games to settle in for an hours-long induction to your new system.

Thrilling though the process may be, there’s a fundamental step all too often skipped: adjusting your settings. From Display and Audio settings to User, Lock, and software settings, there’s plenty to tweak in your Switch 2.

I’ve spent a week with the console, and there are some must-change settings you should adjust before getting started; here are my recommendations.

>>>OXY-003 Battery for Nintendo Game Boy Micro OXY-001 Y76NB01

1. HDR settings

Nintendo Switch 2

Nintendo’s latest console supportsHDR, and you can easily toggle this on and off within the settings. Simply head toSettings > Display > HDROutputand make sure this setting is on by default.

Don’t stop there, though, because there’s a second setting which allows you to choose which games it’s enabled for.Scroll downin the Display menu, and you’ll see (confusingly) anotherHDR Outputoption. Select this, and you can choose between ‘Always Enabled’, ‘Compatible Software Only’, and ‘Disabled’.

I’d recommend switching it on for compatible games instead of the default always-on setting to make sure non-compatible games look as good as ever.

>>>USG-003 Battery for Nintendo DS Lite DSL NDSL

2. Preserve the battery life

Nintendo Switch 2

If you’ve suffered from battery degradation on your first-generation Nintendo Switch, you’ll be delighted to know that the Switch 2 offers a setting that caps your battery life at around 90 percent while it’s on charge, which should help your battery long-term. Simply head to Settings > System > Stop Charging Around 90%.

You can easily toggle this on and off any time, so if you want a full charge every now and then for a long day of gaming in handheld mode, it’s just a matter of a quick trip to the settings. Alternatively, you can simply outsource the load and try aportable battery for your Nintendo Switch 2.

3. TV resolution

Nintendo Switch 2

Gamers, rejoice – the Nintendo Switch 2 can support screen resolutions up to4K, albeit at a 60Hz refresh rate and 60fps for most titles, but you might have different ideas for your new console. Again, head toSettings > Display > TV Resolution.

Within the settings, you can toggle automatic resolution detection or manually set the resolution for your TV, especially handy if you would prefer the higher refresh rates available in 1440p or 1080p resolutions.

4. Change your lock settingsNintendo Switch 2Nintendo Switch 2

Depending on who else will be using your Switch, you may want to change your Lock Screen settings with the system lock menu.

Head toSettings > User, where you can select toSkip Selection Screenif you’re the only one using the console regularly. Alertanitlvey, head toSettings > System > Console Lock. Here, you can set a PIN to keep prying eyes and grubby hands off your new console, but you can also opt toadd parental controls using the dedicated Nintendo Switch Parental Controls app.

5. Activate Dark Mode

Sure, this one is a preference-based tip, but personally, I don’t see why you’d prefer to use the standard white theme over dark. Especially if you play mostly in handheld, it’s a great way to conserve power and give your eyes some rest.

Once again, navigate toSettings > Themesand select between Basic White and Basic Black.

Sony WH-1000XM6 vs Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3: what I learned while testing 2025’s best premium wireless headphones

This year’s strongest premium headphones battle it out for supremacy

The New Sony WH-1000XM6 Noise-Canceling Headphones: How To Buy Online

Sony WH-1000XM6

The Sony WH-1000XM6 are a fantastic pair of over-ear headphones that combine the best design elements of their predecessors, while leveling up their sonic and ANC capabilities. With super-clean touch controls, an ultra-comfy fit and a ton of features, there’s a lot to love about these headphones, even if they do come at quite the cost.

Pros

  • Class-leading noise cancellation
  • Refined, responsive touch controls
  • Incredibly feature-rich companion app

Cons

  • Px7 S3 have slightly superior sound quality
  • No Snapdragon Sound/aptX support
  • Slightly chunky earcups

also:723741 Battery for Sony WH-1000XM5

Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3

Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3 review: gorgeous over-ear ANC headphones with  near-perfect sound | TechRadar

The Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3 are impressive in pretty much every aspect. They have a strong feature-set that’s expanding via updates, excellent build quality, but most of all, some of the best sound you can get from any headphones at this price, while still delivering very good ANC.

Pros

  • Open, balanced, and entertaining sound
  • Phenomenal build quality
  • More features coming in update

Cons

  • Sony’s active noise cancellation is better
  • On-ear controls aren’t as smart as Sony
  • Not fully foldable, so less portable than Sony

TheSonyWH-1000XM6 and Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3 are easily among thebest headphoneswe’ve seen come out in 2025. If you’re looking to buy a pair of thebest noise cancelling headphonesaround, both models should certainly be up for consideration, with each offering excellent features, audio performance and build quality.

If you’re a little unsure on which model is right for you, it’s your lucky day! I’m here to break down the absolute best and worst (spoiler, there’s barely any of that) aspects of these headphones, to help you make the best possible choice.

TheBowers & Wilkins Px7 S3got an incredible five-star review from us, thanks primarily to their jaw-dropping sound-for-pound quality. But we adored theSony WH-1000XM6too for their best-in-class ANC and upgraded design. I’ve tested both models side by side for weeks on end, and I’ve learnt a lot about their capabilities, so we’ll take a look at what precisely sets them apart. Let the battle begin!

>>>CP1254-A4 Battery for Sony WF-1000X WF-1000XM3 WF-SP700N

Sony WH-1000XM6 vs Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3: price and availability

The Sony WH-1000XM6 launched in May 2025, just a few weeks after the release of the Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3. Sony’s new cans cost $449 / £399 / AU$699, which is by no means cheap.

But what do you know, the Px7 S3 cost the exact same amount as the Sony cans in each territory – though we have seen them on sale in the UK at one stage for just under £370. Both models, it’s fair to say, are comfortably in the premium tier as far as wireless headphones are concerned.

Each model comes in three different color options: Black, Midnight Blue, or Platinum Silver for the Sony WH-1000XM6; and Anthracite Black, Canvas White or Indigo Blue for the Px7 S3. For reference, I’ve been using the Platinum Silver and Canvas White options in my testing.

>>>CP1250-A4 Battery for Sony WF-1000XM3 WF-XB700 WF-H800

Sony WH-1000XM6 vs Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3: specs

 Sony WH-1000XM6Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3
Price$449 / £399 / AU$699$449 / £399 / AU$699
Drivers30mm dynamic40mm dynamic
Active noise cancellationYesYes
Battery life30 hours (ANC on)30 hours (ANC on)
Weight254g300g
ConnectivityBluetooth 5.3, 3.5mmBluetooth 5.3, 3.5mm
WaterproofingNoneNone

Sony WH-1000XM6 vs Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3: features

Both the XM6 and Px7 S3 are packed with the standard features you’d want from a pair of modern headphones – think fast-pairing, multi-point connectivity, wear detection and, of course, active noise cancellation. But there’s something of a chasm in terms of the amount offered by each rival.

Let’s start with Sony, which, for me, is supplying one of the most complete, detail-oriented user experiences on the market right now through the Sound Connect app. There are some awesome options such as scene-based listening, Cinema and Background Music modes for creating spatial audio from stereo sound, head-gesture monitoring (for accepting or rejecting calls), and Bluetooth Auracast.

The real standout, though, is the noise cancelling. If you haven’t already seen me rave about this elsewhere, I’ll be clear – the WH-1000XM6 are the king of ANC right now. None of the rivals I’ve tried – not even theBose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones– can top Sony’s flagships when it comes to crushing external noise. That’s because the XM6 harness the power of 12 microphones and fine-tune them in real time to enable a distraction-free listening experience.

Whether I’m traveling on public transport, walking near a busy road or working in a chatter-filled office I’m always treated to silence, or at least, near-silence. Honestly, it’s made it hard to go back to any other headphones.

Now, the Px7 S3aregood when it comes to noise cancelling – definitely an improvement over their predecessors. That’s thanks to a new ANC platform, which Bowers apparently built from scratch. It uses a total of eight mics to monitor the output of the drivers as well as outside noise in an effort to serve up its best-ever ANC.

And it works well, dulling almost all sounds effectively. But I just don’t get that same level of silence that the XM6 induce – the hum of a train sounded more prominent when using the Px7 S3 and traffic noise seeped through a little more.

Sony WH-1000XM6 and Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3 leaning against pole

Still, the Px7 do put forward a good passthrough ‘transparency’ mode, which enables you to be a bit more aware of your surroundings if, say, you’re walking in a super built-up area. Sony’s passthrough mode is a little more developed – you can adjust the level of noise that sneaks in with a slider and trigger it with a Speak to Chat option, or by covering the right earcup with your hand.

One final note on noise cancelling, though: both of these models are fantastic at maintaining excellent audio quality, even with ANC on. So regardless of which headphones you opt for, have no fear – you can still get a top-tier listening experience while shutting out your surroundings.

The only point of distraction Isometimesencountered was wind noise, which could be fairly prominent when using the Px7 S3, but wasn’t all too much of an issue with the XM6.

An area that Sony does considerably better in, though, is EQ adjustment. There’s a Find Your Equalizer mode, which creates a sound profile based on your personal taste; a 10-band custom EQ calibrator and some presets too. Meanwhile, the Px7 S3 offer a five band custom equalizer. I should say, though, that they already sounded incredible out of the box.

One area where there’s little-to-no difference, though, is battery life. Both sets of headphones go for 30 hours with ANC on. That’s… all right. There are competitors, such as theSennheiser Momentum 4 WirelessorCambridge Audio P100that can double that – but both the Sony and B&W cans can be charged while in-use, so it should be easy to avoid running out of juice, even if you’re on the move.

Both also harness their microphone systems to plate up great call quality, though the Sony cans are superior here. A combination of beamforming mics and AI sound processing ensure your voice is lifted away from pesky background noises, making foractuallycrystal-clear calling.

So yes, the Px7 S3 have a lot of nice features to mess around with and more coming. They’ve also made some substantial improvements in the way of noise cancelling and call quality. But the WH-1000XM6 are simply ahead of the competition. You can’t do better features-wise right now, and that’s why they take the edge for me.

Bowers & Wilkins PX7 S3 review | Tom's Guide

Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3

Sony WH-1000XM6 vs Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3: sound quality

As you’d likely expect, both the Sony WH-1000XM6 and the Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3 plate up excellent audio quality, making significant improvements over their respective predecessors.

The WH-1000XM6 deliver brilliantly clear, detailed audio, right across the frequency range. There’s a more balanced sound out of the box than I heard with both the Sony WH-1000XM5 and Sony WH-1000XM4, in part thanks to input from world-renowned mastering engineers throughout the headphones’ development process.

When tuning into tracks such asMole Moves Houseby Count Basic, I was struck by the tonal accuracy and rhythmic precision of each element, with smooth bass, gliding guitar and funky percussion coming through cleanly and cohesively.

The ability of the XM6 to separate out each instrumental element is pretty solid too – no matter the genre, I was never subjected to a bloated, busy interpretation of my favorite tunes.

When I spoke to some of Sony’s sound team at the XM6’s unveiling, they highlighted increased width as one of the largest changes, sonically speaking, over previous models. And don’t get me wrong, that’s definitely noticeable – I mean, there’s even a Cinema mode that upmixes a stereo signal into a more immersive format when you’re watching movies on the go.

But still, I can’t help but feel that the Px7 S3 offereven betterwidth and immersive audio.

Sony WH-1000XM6 and Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3 earcups

From the very moment I placed the Bowers cans on my head and fired up Tidal, I was struck by one thing above all: an open, almost spatial property to audio, which really sucked me into the music.

And despite the phenomenal levels of width and depth they provide – which unlocks a ton of breathing space for each individual instrument to operate – there’s an undeniably stronger coherence to their presentation.

I should mention, too, that the Px7 S3 are set to get a spatial audio upgrade at a later stage, which will be accessible via the Bowers & Wilkins Music app. Sony has some spatial and head-tracking options for the XM6, but these only work on certain devices that support Android’s built-in head tracking, which doesn’t include thebest Samsung phones(and obviously rules outAppledevices).

One thing the Px7 S3 are a little more adept at than the Sony’s is the ability to almost air-lift vocal performances out of the mix, push them forward, and allow you to enjoy them in all of their glory. When tuning intoRains againby Solji, which has a real focus on higher-pitched, showstopping singing, I was gripped by the prominent positioning of vocals, which were incredibly crisp and expressive, making for a truly luxury listen.

I want to be clear – the XM6 also perform fantastically well. They just, perhaps, lack the openness of the Px7 S3. Both sets of headphones can reveal a huge degree of intricacies – in part, thanks to the inclusion of LDAC on the XM6 and aptX adaptive or aptX lossless on the Px7 S3.

All in all, these two rivals are wonderfully talented in their own right – but there can only be one winner. And in this case, I have to hand it to the Px7 S3. They may not have quite as many EQ options as the XM6, but that doesn’t matter. They sound fantastic out of the box and I was utterly hypnotized by their sound signature.Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3 over-ear noise-cancelling headphones on a white surface

Sony WH-1000XM6 vs Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3: design

I barely have a bad word to say about either of these headphones, especially when it comes to design. Both of these have stunning looks, high build quality and great carry cases, meaning that you can see and feel the luxury nature of your premium purchase.

The WH-1000XM6 have borrowed the aesthetic of their predecessor, the XM5, with a sleek frame and a nice amount of padding on the headband and earcups for comfortable multi-hour listening sessions. They have a slightly wider headband than older Sony models for enhanced comfort and I can easily keep them on for hours on end without feeling irritated.

I’d argue that the earcups do looka littlechunky when wearing the headphones, and the carry case – though conveniently magnetic – is ever so slightly bigger than other ones I’ve used.

Meanwhile, the Px7 S3 are even better looking, for me. They have fabric details on the headband as well as the earcups, as well as neat metallic details and generous padding for high comfort. I did initially feel that they were a little tight on my head, but after a few days of listening, they soon adjusted to my liking.

Sony WH-1000XM6 folded next to Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3

The Px7 S3 opt for a zip-up case, which isn’t as quick and easy to use as the XM6 alternative. But I can’t deny the case’s classy, understated looks, which totally won me over. Again, its not the tiniest case on the market, but there’s a reason for that – these aren’t fully foldable. That’s not ideal if you need compact cans that you can throw in a small bag on the go.

The XM6, of course,arefoldable, but use stronger hinges than their ancestor, the XM4 – or the XM5, come to that, which weren’t foldable but had their own hinge issues.

Another thing the Px7 skip out on is touch controls. Now, for some, this may be a blessing. I’ve encountered some people that find touch controls in general to be finicky, unreliable, or too easy to trigger when you’re just adjusting your cans. These instead opt for traditional button controls, which areeasy-to-use.

But in honesty, I’d urge touch control haters to give the XM6 a go. They supply the most consistent, intuitive controls I’ve ever tried on any headphones. You can swipe and hold to adjust volume, flick sideways to skip and play tracks, tap twice – rather than once – to play/pause and even cover the right earcup to trigger passthrough mode. I’ve had no issues whatsoever with the XM6’s touch controls, and I much prefer using them to the more old-school approach of the Px7 S3’s physical buttons.

A couple of things before we move on. Neither of these models has any kind of waterproofing – something that’s very much commonplace for thebest over-ear headphones, though I’m hoping future evolutions will bring some kind of water resistance to the table.

Both have 3.5mm headphone ports, though, meaning you can indulge in wired listening if you’d prefer. However, only the B&W Px7 S3 can take USB-C lossless Hi-Res Audio over this input.

Overall, I prefer the look and feel of the Px7 S3. Yet I can’t help but find the XM6 to be more practical and pleasing to use, thanks to their foldability and future-facing touch controls. For that reason, I think we’ll call this round a tie.Sony WH-1000XM6 folded inside magnetic case

Sony WH-1000XM6 vs Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3: value

Despite both of these models coming at, let’s face it, a pretty steep price, I still feel as if they each pack a great amount of bang for your buck.

The WH-1000XM6 are some of the most feature-rich headphones on the market, boasting class-leading noise cancelling, intelligent touch controls, amazing call quality and, of course, upgraded sound. I think, as a pair of all-rounders, they’re arguably the best that money can buy right now.

And as for the Px7 S3, I’m really not sure you could find better sound quality from any other over-ears in this price range. Their open, yet cohesive sound signature is intoxicating, and that’s the true draw here. Because yes, I’d argue the XM6 have superior features and portability. But they can’t quite beat Bowers for pure audio talents.

So I think it’ll come down to what your priority is. If it’s sound quality first, and you’re happy for other features to be very good but not quite best-in-class, then go Bowers. If you want all-rounders with the best ANC you can get, so Sony.

Yes, $450 / £400 / AU$700 is a lot of money to spend on some new headphones. But for the price you pay, you’re getting headphones that are leading the pack in some really crucial areas. Whichever pair you pick, I’m almost certain you’ll love what you see, feel and most importantly, hear.Person folding up the Sony WH-1000XM6

Sony WH-1000XM6 vs Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3: verdict

Our battle has reached a truly epic conclusion. As you can see, there’s little to separate these two models overall. And that adds up, because if I learnt one thing from testing the WH-1000XM6 and Px7 S3 side by side, its that they’re both top-tier headphones…but meant for two different kinds of buyer.

If you want all the modern features, great sound quality, top-tier noise cancellation and a highly compact design, then I’d recommend the XM6 all day long. As I mentioned above, they’re an S-tier option if you’re seeking out a true all-rounder.

But if you’re willing to sacrifice a few features and the best sound cancelling in the game for the best sound available, then the Px7 S3 are right for you. I absolutely adore the almost spatial-sounding approach these headphones take – their immersive, well-separated audio just keeps me coming back for more and more.

Microsoft has broken Windows Hello facial recognition — it no longer works in the dark

Windows Hello Face is slightly worse off, though savvy users have found a workaround

Razer Blade 16

Windows Hello has seen a minor downgrade this week, as the servicenow requiresthe use of a color camera in tandem with IR sensors to sign users in. While the update was announced back in April, users are only now seeing the fruits of the update, with Windows Hello no longer functioning in the dark.

Facial recognition through Windows Hello has used IR sensors to save a 3D scan of a user’s face, without the need for visual confirmation through a webcam, for years. This allowed users to sign in with Windows Hello Face recognition in the dark, just as Apple’s Face ID sign-in works. But the new change, made in response to a”spoofing vulnerability”found in April, makes the login service both more secure and more inconvenient.

The change has seen varying responses in reporting so far. Some reports fromWindows Centraland elsewhere online confirm the Windows Hello login no longer functions in the dark, whereasPCWorldreports the reflection of light coming from a laptop screen was enough to give the webcam something to work with.

There is some heightened concern for those users with darker skin tones. Darker faces can be harder for cameras to resolve in low light, perhaps making Hello’s functionality in the dark even worse for people of color. Just as motion-activated faucets and other tools can fail to see non-white hands in some situations, Windows Hello may prove worse in the dark for those whose faces reflect less light.

There does exist a workaround to bypass the new webcam requirements for Windows Hello. Users can use Windows Device Manager to disable their color webcam, at which point Windows Hello will still function using only the IR sensors.

Of course, disabling your webcam means that you will no longer have a working camera, so the usefulness of this workaround exchanges the problem of “no Windows Hello in the dark” for “no camera in meetings”, a swap few people would be willing to make.

>>>G3HTA056H Battery for Microsoft Surface Pro X 13″ Tablet

And of course, quick Windows Hello sign-in is possible in many ways beyond webcam facial recognition. PIN, password, and fingerprint login options all already exist for PC users without built-in Windows Hello-compatible webcam/sensor solutions, and those worried about not being able to log in in the dark would be best served by swapping their login option to another, more accessible mode.

The Play Store just added a small tweak that could save you money

The Google Play Store logo on a purple background

While manyAI services aim to replace appswith all-in-one solutions, the Google Play Store remains home tothousands of appson Android. While the Play Store offers easy access to free and paid apps, manyusers have accidentally purchasedpaid apps — especially with kids around. Google is now tweaking the purchase process on Android to reduce accidental purchases.

As spotted by9to5Google, Google is rolling out a change to the Play Store where purchasing apps now requires a “slide-to-buy” gesture to complete the transaction. Until now, the Play Store used a single “1-tap buy” button, which sometimes led to unintended purchases. This has now been replaced with a Slide to Buy pill.

>>>GWRL2 Battery for Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

You’ll have to slide instead of tap to buy apps on the Play Store now

Play Store new UI to purchase apps

Source: 9to5Google

Old vs. new app purchase UI in Google Play Store

The new pill features a circular button with two arrows pointing right, signaling users to swipe right to confirm the purchase. According to the report, there’s also a bounce animation to guide first-time users through this updated process.

Previously, users had to press two separate buttons to complete aPlay Storepurchase. Now, the added swipe action introduces slightly more friction to further prevent accidental purchases. The update is rolling out with version 46.5.19-31 of the Play Store, although I haven’t seen the change yet. Like many Google updates, this could be a server-side rollout that takes a few weeks to reach everyone.

>>>GDHB7 Battery for Google GDHB7

In addition, Google appears to be testing several other changes on the Play Store. Just earlier today, the company was seen testing the new Material 3 Expressive design, and it recently rolled out the “Ask Play about this app” feature, which uses Gemini to answer user questions about an app.

65% VS. 75% KEYBOARD: WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THESE TWO SIZES?

Two 75% keyboards side by side

When setting up your workstation — whether at home or in the office — one of the things you’re probably most particular about is your keyboard, and for good reason. It can be a bit of a space hog, so its size will largely dictate how much you can fit into your desk. That’s why before even deciding on what other extra peripherals like speakers, lighting, and desk organizers to get, it’s best to pick out a keyboard first.

There are multiple keyboard sizes out there for every need. If you typically work with numerical data and calculations, the full-size long keyboard with 104 keys is ideal for you. If you need something more compact but doesn’t sacrifice functionality, then you’re better off with the 87% keyboard. But if all you’re after is minimalism and portability, the smallest 60% keyboard sounds more like your style.

Besides these three major keyboard sizes, though, you’ll also frequently encounter two other options: 65% and 75%. These keyboards are very close in percentage, so it’s easy to mistake one for the other. But upon closer inspection, they actually have distinct features. Let’s go over how the 65% keyboard differs from the 75% layout.

>>>Acer Aspire 7 A715-42 A315-56-57 CB315-3H Replacement Battery

65% versus 75% keyboard size

Keychron 65% keyboard on desk with Mac computer and mouse

Both the 65% and 75% keyboards are considered compact and space-saving. But there’s one thing that clearly differentiates the two: their set of available keys. On the 65% keyboard, you usually only get 68. It still has all four arrow keys unlike the smaller 60% layout, but the navigation buttons are reduced to about three or four depending on the brand. Some mechanical keyboard brands like Keychron and HyperX include Delete, Home, PgUp, and PgDn. Others like the Royal Kludge and Corsair don’t have the Home button. To make the 65% keyboard even more compact, the function row and number pad have been removed completely too. They’re now integrated into the number row at the very top.

Meanwhile, on the 75% layout, you’ll typically find 84 keys. It’s still considerably smaller than the full-size keyboard since it no longer features a number pad. However, it retains the entire function row, arrow keys, and a couple of the navigation buttons, such as Delete, PgUp, PgDown, Home, and End. Most 75% keyboards also come complete with a volume knob in the upper right corner.

>>>Acer AP21B7Q Replacement Battery

With how they’re designed, the 65% and 75% keyboards serve different purposes too. The smaller keyboard is best for casual typists who want a minimalist desk setup, on-the-go users who don’t like lugging around long and bulky gear, and even gamers who need the desk space to use their mouse comfortably. The 75% layout, on the other hand, is suited for writers and people who mainly work with text and beginner programmers who need access to more shortcut keys.

NO, FLOPPY DISKS AREN’T DEAD: HERE’S HOW THEY’RE STILL BEING USED

A stack of colored floppy disks on a wooden surface

When talking about vintage tech from the ’90s, it’s common for millennials to bring up the Walkman, Tamagotchi, Polaroid cameras, and CDs. All of these died out and then saw a recent resurgence — save for CDs, which never really went away and are still largely used by the music industry. One piece of ’90s tech that has seemingly been forgotten and never returned, though, is the floppy disk. Although it still holds on as the standard icon for the “Save” function in computers and apps, nothing much has been said about this physical storage format in both mainstream and alternative media in recent years. And this is likely because the floppy disk is now considered a relic of the past.

Interestingly, though floppy disks are obsolete in modern computing, they remain in use in some niches. Hence, we can’t really consider them dead, especially when very important industries still rely on them for official storage use. One industry that continues to utilize floppy disks is the aviation industry. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) still uses floppy disks to manage flight and air traffic data. The reason why many airports in the country still use floppy disks is that the entire infrastructure of air traffic control systems was developed in the 1990s, and at the time, floppy disks were the standard storage format for computers. However, amid concerns about how the outdated format affects the safety and efficiency of modern air travel, the FAA is working to eliminate the dated tech soon.

also:A1540 Charger for Apple Macbook 12″ A1534 USB-C

Other industries that still use the floppy disk

Aside from the FAA, other important industries still use the seemingly dead floppy disk for data storage. The medical sector continues to rely on floppy disks to store patient records and other medical data. Doctors in Norway reportedly used the dated storage format to receive monthly updates to their patient lists as recently as 2015. The Norwegian government even handed out diskettes to medical professionals each month for this purpose. As to why the medical profession still preferred floppy disks, Norwegian software developer Finn Gundersen explained it in a 2015 blog post: “[F]loppy disks are inexpensive; they cost far less than a USB drive and are far less time-consuming to write to than a CD-ROM for this amount of data. Given the historical restriction of delivery by mail, and the data volume being less than 1.44MB, they are the logical choice.”

Some train systems also remain loyal to floppy disks. The Muni Metro light railway in San Francisco, for instance, still requires a diskette to boot up its Automatic Train Control System every morning. However, there’s word that a project to replace the system is underway, so the railway is expected to bid farewell to the physical floppy disk by 2033. Meanwhile, some textile factories also utilize floppy disks to run their older machines. According to textile expert Matthew Hollinshead, they are unlikely to change out their older input system for fear that newer storage formats could introduce bugs and cause issues with their machinery.

also:815049-001 Charger for HP Elite x2 45W USB-C

Are floppy disks still in production?

A technician fanning out multiple floppy disks in one hand

Although floppy disks are still used by different industries, including some music labels with unique marketing campaigns, the days of this antiquated technology are numbered. Some industries are wedded to floppy disks because their legacy systems only work with the format. Once they begin replacing their old computers and machinery with newer systems, they will likely move on from diskettes and start using more modern alternatives. They may also be forced to get rid of their legacy systems once the remaining supply of floppy disks runs out. The last major manufacturer of diskettes officially stopped production in 2010. Everything that is in circulation is either a product of the final output or recycled disks.

Tom Persky, the owner of floppydisk.com, a company that sells and recycles floppy disks, said in 2022 that he’s the “last man standing in the floppy disk business.” At the time, he shared that he had half a million floppy disks in 3.5-inch, 5.25-inch, and 8-inch sizes in stock. However, he was also receiving up to 1,000 pre-owned and new disks a day from people sending diskettes in for recycling. He hasn’t released any updates about his inventory since, but his website continues to sell both new and used disks in bulk. While Persky has been supplying floppy disks to multiple industries with dated equipment and computers, he admitted that many hobbyists also buy diskettes from his website. It’s unclear how long his supply will last.

The best noise-cancelling earbuds for all budgets, chosen by our reviewers

Need the best noise-cancelling earbuds? Look no further

Bose QuietComfort Earbuds

(Image credit: Bose)

Our expert audio team has picked all of the best noise-cancelling earbuds for this guide after testing and evaluating hundreds of thebest wireless earbuds. They assessed each pair and judged them on audio quality, comfort, and features, selecting only the top performers after hours of in-depth, hands-on comparisons.

Every pair of noise-cancelling earbuds this guide has also been tested in real-world settings to ensure their noise-blocking tech works effectively in all kinds of environments, with comparisons against their peers to make our testing as fair as possible. We also check the battery life in real life as well, to make sure they’ve living up to their claims.

This guide includes a range of the best noise-cancelling earbuds, covering everything from budget-friendly options to high-end models that rival thebest noise-cancelling headphones. While there’s some crossover with ourbest earbudsguide, this list assumes that the most important thing to you is noise cancellation, so we’ve slightly re-prioritised how we choose which is the best.

We currently rate the Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds as the best options, but here’s something important to note: in June 2025,Bose announced a a new 2nd Generation version of these earbuds, with promised improvements to their noise cancellation skills, and wireless charging will new be included as standard. At the time of updating this guide, Bose hadn’t announced a specific release date for the new earbuds – only “summer 2025” – and we haven’t tested the new earbuds yet, so while we happily recommend the original Ultra Earbuds still, this is something to keep in mind.

>>>020-00098 Battery for Apple Airpods 1 2 1st 2nd Wireless Charge A1596

The best noise-cancelling earbuds you can buy today

The best noise-cancelling earbuds overall

The Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds The Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds

1. Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds

The best noise-cancelling earbuds overall

Specifications

Acoustic design:Closed

Weight:6.24g per earbud

Frequency response:Not specified

Drivers:10mm

Battery life:6 hours (buds) 24 hours total (with case)

Reasons to buy

+Excellent head-tracked spatial audio
+Lossless audio codec support
+Still the best noise-cancelling in earbuds

Reasons to avoid

-Case cannot charge wirelessly unless you buy a cover
-Physically very similar to the previous model

BUY THEM IF

✅ Noise cancellation really matters to you:These buds are at the top of the ANC game as it stands right now.

✅ You want ultimate immersion:ANC wraps you in a bubble of silence, but add Bose’s Immersive Audio and you’ve got a cinematic experience.

DON’T BUY THEM IF

You want wireless charging:Bose makers you pay more for a cover to put over the case that adds this. Weird.

You’re on a budget:These buds have had a significant price reduction since launch, and are seeing huge sales season discounts, but they’re still expensive.

>>>M1454S2 Battery for Bose QuietComfort II Noise Cancelling Headphones

The Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds are our best overall noise-cancelling earbuds thanks to their stellar ANC and immersive sound. These buds are the ultimate travel companion, offering a “bubble of silence” to block out distractions, whether you’re on a noisy flight or a bustling commute.

Bose has always done ANC remarkably well, and the most recent QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds are the most effective on the market. These buds are even more of an attractive proposition since Bose addressed some issues in its July 2024 update, introducing multi-point connectivity (this was lacking at launch), which makes it easier to switch between two devices.

Battery life clocks in at 6 hours per charge (24 hours with the case), which isn’t the best on the market but will do for most people’s use. Oddly, you need to buy an accessory for the case if you want to add wireless charging.

Sound performance isn’t as audiophile-grade as options from rivals likeSony, but it is enhanced over previous Bose buds with Immersive Audio technology, which delivers head-tracked spatial sound across devices, supported by aptX Adaptive. While some competitors may offer better dynamic detail, these earbuds provide a lively and balanced audio experience, which we found deeply enjoyable during our testing.

The design of the Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds closely mirrors their predecessors, with a lighter build and upgraded silicone bands, which we found gave us a better fit as we reviewed them. At the discounted price of around $220/£199 we’ve spotted recently, these earbuds are a smart investment if ANC is your top priority.

Bose has announced that the QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds 2nd Gen are coming in “summer 2025”, which promise more reactive active noise cancellation, and wireless charging will now be built-into the case as standard. We haven’t tested them yet, and they’re set to launch at $299 – so assuming you can buy these for the kind of discounted price mentioned above (or perhaps even cheaper), we’re happy still recommending these as our top choice for now.

>>>762936HV-1 Battery for Bose QuietComfort Earbuds Charging Case

The best budget noise-cancelling earbudsThe Earfun Air Pro 3 true wireless earbudsEarfun Air Pro 3 buds on wooden tableEarfun Air Pro 3 case closed on wooden table

2. EarFun Air Pro 3

The best budget noise-cancelling earbuds

Specifications

Acoustic design:Closed

Weight:52g

Frequency response:N/A

Drivers:Not listed

Battery life :ANC off: 9 hours (buds) 36 hours (case); ANC on: 7 hours (buds) 37 hours (case)

Reasons to buy

+Great all-rounders
+Excellent battery life
+Solid noise cancellation

Reasons to avoid

-No wearing detection
-Sound is fun but not fantastic
-Stem design not for everyone

BUY THEM IF

✅ You like the long stem design:Many buds have a stem these days but these are on the longer side.

✅ You want all-rounder buds for less:Few buds tick the boxes for comfy design, good ANC, solid sound and great battery life for under $100/£100.

DON’T BUY THEM IF

You need ANC that places you in a cocoon of silence:ANC is good here, but it doesn’t deliver that almost eerie silence you get from higher-end buds.

You want compact buds:The stem design literally stands out and the mirror finish does draw attention to the buds, rivals are more subtle.

If you’re on a budget the EarFun Air Pro 3 earbuds are our top recommendation. The ANC doesn’t deliver the cocoon of silence you’d expect from higher-end options, but we thought it was good – especially considering the price. It’s capable of reducing low-end sounds pretty effectively, including traffic noise, so it makes it much easier to hear what you’re listening to. Other features include an impressive 45 hours of battery life in total, including the case, as well as multipoint pairing, which we found worked well.

The Earfun Air Pro 3 come with some good audio specs. And, while these noise-cancelling earbuds might not win awards in sound quality, those specs deliver an audio performance that is great for the price, although not perfect.

Design-wise, they look a little boring with long stems. When you first pick up these buds you’ll notice they feel plasticky – by which I mean: cheap – but that’s kind of good news as they’re also incredibly light at 52g for both buds and case. We often find the lighter the buds, the comfier the fit, but that’s not always the case.

The Earfun Air Pro 3 buds are accomplished, especially considering their price. Amid a sea of similarly-priced efforts onAmazon, they stand out thanks to their superior design and solid audio chops, showing a high level of competence and excellent value.

The best mid-range noise-cancelling earbudsNothing Ear (a) earbuds on a brown sofa, in their closed case – with transparent lidNothing Ear (a) held in a hand, with the case in the background

3. Nothing Ear (a)

The best mid-range noise-cancelling earbuds

Specifications

Acoustic design:Closed

Weight:4.8g per earbud

Frequency response:Not stated (other than 5000Hz range)

Drivers:11mm custom

Battery life:Buds: 5.5hrs (9.5hrs without ANC) Total with case: 24.5hrs (42.5hrs without ANC)

Reasons to buy

+Fun, zealous, expansive sound
+Vastly improved active noise cancellation
+Smaller, more pocketable case

Reasons to avoid

-No wireless charging support
-No flagship sound profile curation

BUY THEM IF

✅ You want good-value ANC and sound:The noise cancelling and audio quality here is fantastic. You will find better, but would have to pay significantly more.

✅ Style matters to you:The whole Nothing brand is incredibly cool and these earbuds are the most stylish.

DON’T BUY THEM IF

You want great spatial audio:That’s not here. You’d have to look at rivals, but most would charge much more for that audio wizardry.

Your inner ear is small:We got a good fit with the small ear tips but the design may not suit those with a tiny concha (aka ear-well).

The Nothing Ear (a) pack in some seriously impressive ANC all for a great value, mid-range price. They’re our top pick if you want to nix ambient sounds and you’re willing to pay more than budget prices for that luxury.

We know that Nothing buds all look quite similar. Which, admittedly isn’t a problem because that look is cool, stylish and bound to get attention. But don’t be fooled by the Nothing Ear (a), they’ve had some major improvements. The most notable is noise cancellation. You can choose from High, Mid, Low, and Adaptive profiles. In our review, we wrote: “High is very good: the hairdryer we used for testing was largely nixed.” You’ll find even better ANC out there, but you’ll have to pay high-end prices to notice a serious step up. In terms of other features, you’ll also find clear calls, some basic EQ settings and profiles, reliable on-ear controls. Bluetooth v5.3 and LDAC support for hi-res audio.

In our review, we commented that, when paired with a Sony smartphone, LDAC files are “delivered with expanse and pinpoint accuracy when it comes to the placement of each sonic article.” Even regular lossy files, the kind you’d find on Spotify, perform well here, delivering a sound we described as “fun and zealous”. Again, you’ll find better sound out there, but you’d have to pay over twice as much.

Looks-wise, Nothing buds have always been distinctive thanks to a transparent stem design. With the Nothing Ear (a) you get a smaller form factor that’s even easier to carry in a pocket. During testing, we found these buds incredibly comfortable to wear and they come with a choice of small, medium and large silicone tips. The only thing we will say is that if you have very, very small ears the design might be a bit big in your concha (that’s your ear well), so if you can it would make sense to try before you buy.

All in all, these are a seriously impressive pair of buds, especially considering their mid-range price. You get great sound, a slick design and ANC that really impressed us. You’d have to pay big bucks to find buds that seriously improve on all of these points. Which is why this is our top mid-range recommendation for most people.

The best noise-cancelling earbuds for AppleThe Apple AirPods Pro 2 on a wooden surface.Apple AirPods Pro 2 one bud in hand

4. Apple AirPods Pro 2

The best noise-cancelling earbuds for Apple

Specifications

Acoustic design:Closed

Weight:5.3g

Frequency response:Not listed

Drivers:Custom Apple design

Battery life :6 hours (earbuds) 30 hours (charging case)

Reasons to buy

+Astounding noise-stopping power
+Very good sound quality, too
+Small and very lightweight

Reasons to avoid

-Average battery life
-No aptX or LDAC support

BUY THEM IF

✅ You want great sound:The AirPods Pro 2 sound brilliantandshut out the real world so well.

✅ You’ve got all manner of Apple things:If you’ve got an iPad, Apple TV, Apple Watch or similar, then you’ll really get the benefit of these buds.

DON’T BUY THEM IF

You want to save money:Not the most expensive buds, but you can find cheaper options that do similar – but, crucially, not better.

You don’t have an iPhone:If you’re in the Android world, you won’t get as much benefit from these earbuds.

The AirPods Pro 2 might not be as accomplished as the Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds at the top of our list in terms of ANC, but they’re not far off. We found the noise-cancelling to be so good in the Pro 2 buds it was almost eerie. As with other ANC buds, there’s a transparency mode on offer for conversations, and that’s now been upgraded so it adapts to your conversations, making them sound more natural. Features-wise, these buds have a lot to offer, but you’ll get the most from them – like ‘Find My’ features – if you have an iPhone.

During our testing, we found the audio performance to be stunning, offering up a rich sound regardless of genre and a wide and expansive soundstage, which is thanks to new drivers and amplifiers. Personalized Spatial Audio is a bonus here, where a scan of your face and ears can be used to re-calibrate the sound performance of the AirPods Pro 2.

Design-wise, they look similar to the Pro model that came before them. Expect the clean lines and solid build qualityAppleis famous for, and slightly smaller stems that protrude from your ears. We enjoyed wearing them and liked the addition from volume control in the stems.

Of course, the AirPods Pro 2 work best with an iPhone at least, and even more Apple gear ideally. If that’s you, these are among the most impressive noise-cancelling earbuds you can buy today and are well worth the price tag – especially because much of the competition has become more expensive than these. Grab them on their semi-regular discounts to under $199/£199 and they’re a bargain.

In iOS 18, AirPods Pro 2 got updated with some useful new features, including improved voice isolation for calls, and the ability to respond to Siri prompts, such as incoming calls, by nodding or shaking your head. At Apple’sSeptember 2024 showcase, the company unveiled some further changes that have now arrived on the AirPods Pro 2, including new health features. The most notable is a hearing test, which Apple says could help diagnose potential issues, and a new hearing aid mode approved by the FDA. It’s worth noting also thatAirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellationare now available for $179 / £179 / AU$299, so you no longer have to go Pro to get ANC.

>>>CP1154 Battery for Apple Airpods Pro A2084 A2083

The best noise-cancelling earbuds for Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 ProSamsung Galaxy Buds 3 Pro

5. Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 Pro

The best noise-cancelling earbuds for Samsung phone owners

Specifications

Acoustic Design:Closed

Weight:5.4g (buds) 46.5g (case)

Frequency Response:20Hz-40kHz

Drivers:10mm dynamic driver + planar tweeter

Battery Life:7 hours (buds) 30 hours (case)

Reasons to buy

+Fantastic sound
+Thorough noise cancellation
+Lightweight design

Reasons to avoid

-High price
-Removing eartips is a fuss
-Key features require a newer Galaxy phone

BUY THEM IF

✅ You own a Samsung Galaxy smartphone:These buds give you a bunch of special features, including spatial audio and remarkable hi-res audio.

✅ You’re after top ANC:It may not beat the best of the bunch, but there’s some seriously mighty noise cancellation performance at work here.

DON’T BUY THEM IF

You’re on a budget:These earbuds are high-end and although they’re worth it, there are cheaper rivals.

You own an iPhone:You’d need to be looking to earbuds that offer a dedicated app for iOS.

If you own aSamsungphone and want great noise cancellation, the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro are for you. An update on the previous Buds 2 Pro (which they replace in this guide), these Samsung buds bring you great audio quality, a premium (but familiar) design and truly impressive ANC – there’s certainly a lot to like.

Let’s start with that impressive ANC. In our review of the Buds 3 Pro we commented that these buds are very effective and “throw a blanket over whatever background noise is going on when you’re trying to listen to music.” We also noted that the audio on offer here is among some of the best we’ve ever heard from a pair of wireless buds and what some would consider an optimal sound signature: “The Buds have a V-shaped sound, which means that both the bass and treble are elevated and distinct, while the mids are just a little stepped back.” The result is a wide soundstage that feels rich and full of energy.

The newer Buds 3 Pro also improve on the slightly disappointing battery of their predecessors. This time round you’ll get six hours of battery from the buds themselves, 30 hours with their case, and longer with ANC off. It’s not a huge increase, but it’s something. Samsung has also added some AI-powered features here for Samsung phones, including adaptive ANC (we didn’t think this added much during our testing), a feature which restores crackling voice in poor-quality calls, and live audio translation.

The design of the Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 Pro is similar to AirPods, but with a more angular design we thought looked Toblerone-like during our testing. At 5.4g per bud, they’re lightweight and we found them comfortable to wear. Although switching out the tips to get the best fit was a frustrating process that seemed much more fiddly than it needed to be.

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 Pro are the best value for those with a Samsung device. If you don’t have one, there are better options higher up this list.

The best value noise cancelling earbuds

JLab Go Pop ANC resting against open charging caseUSB-C cable on JLab Go Pop ANC outside of charging case on a stone surfaceJLab Go Pop ANC inside charging case, against a pink background

6. JLab Go Pop ANC

The best noise-cancelling earbuds under $30/£30

Specifications

Acoustic Design:Closed

Weight:4.1g (per bud)

Frequency Response:20Hz-20kHz

Drivers:10mm dynamic

Battery Life:24+ hours total (with case), 7 hours per bud (ANC on)

Reasons to buy

+Incredible low price
+Solid ANC
+Impressive bass and treble

Reasons to avoid

-A little cheap looking
-Mids not super-rich
-Color options aren’t the prettiest

BUY THEM IF

✅ You want ANC on a budget:Cheap buds often don’t come with ANC, but not only is it here, it’s solid too.

You want small, light buds:These buds are tiny and feel light and comfortable to wear. If you’re sick of bulky options, these could be ideal.

DON’T BUY THEM IF

You want audiophile-grade sound:They sound amazing for the price, but these buds aren’t going to impress audiophiles, you’ll have to spend much more.

You want stylish buds:It’s not that they look bad, just a little cheap and plasticky. Although some may love that there are different colors on offer.

In our JLab Go Pop ANC review we commented that these cheap and cheerful buds “have all the hallmarks of an instant budget favorite”, packing in everything you could want from a pair of true wireless earbuds and giving them a $30/£30 price tag.

The sound quality is solid. It’s not mind-blowing, we commented in our review this is likely due to a narrow soundstage and you shouldn’t expect audiophile-grade codes or support at this price. But the audio on offer is still enjoyable, which we said was “thanks to energetic bass and treble output.” We also commended these buds for their punchy bass and lack of tinniness, even when you push them to the highest volumes.

These buds are a great choice if you want a light and comfortable fit – especially if you’ve tried bulky buds for you before and they felt irritating or fell out. There’s also a IP55 water-resistance rating, which means they’ll be fine with some minor splashes and sweaty workouts. To look at, these buds aren’t ugly but they’re not stylish either. In our review, we wrote: “these are a little cheap-looking across the board, from bud to charging case, but they aren’t off-putting by any means.”

Features-wise, you’re getting a lot for budget buds, most notably ANC. In our review, we commented that you won’t experience the close to silence experience that more expensive buds offer, but most distracting sounds will be dulled. With ANC on you can expect 7 hours of battery life from the buds, which is up to the standard of most true wireless earbuds these days. If you’ve got the charging case with you, expect 24 hours in total. In short, the JLab Go Pop ANC are excellent value. Not only do they pack in the essentials, like a comfy fit and good sound, they bring you features that you’d normally have to pay double, even triple the price for, like a companion app, EQ presets, customizable touch controls and, of course, solid ANC.

The best noise-cancelling earbuds for sound

Bowers & Wilkins Pi8 review: sublime sounding in-ears that major on comfort  | Stuff

7. Bowers & Wilkins Pi8

The best noise-cancelling earbuds for sound

Specifications

Acoustic Design:Closed

Weight:7g per earbud

Frequency Response:Not listed

Drivers:12mm carbon cone

Battery Life:6.5 hrs (buds), up to 20hr total

Reasons to buy

+Incredible levels of detail and dynamism
+Good comfort for larger buds
+Effective ANC

Reasons to avoid

-Lacks ear-tip or fit tests
-No head-tracked spatial audio
-Battery life can still be beaten

BUY THEM IF

✅ Top sound is your priority:These buds do a lot of things well, but they’re hands down the best pick if you’re after the best possible audio performance in a wireless design.

You’ve struggled to find buds that fit in the past:We highly rated the fit here, no twisting or jamming them into your ears, just high comfort and good consideration for weight distribution.

DON’T BUY THEM IF

You love being able to control everything from your ear:You do get on-ear controls here, but you have to choose whether you want to change the volume or the ANC profiles, you can’t have both.

❌ You want to listen for hours on end:The battery life here isn’t bad, but plenty of rivals now pack in much more power, like the JBL Live Beam 3at #10.

All of the earbuds in this guide offer strong ANC and sound quality – otherwise they wouldn’t be here – but the Bowers & Wilkins Pi8 buds are among the best wireless earbuds we’ve tested for sheer sonic performance, and the noise cancellation, features and fit all score highly too.

To add some context, the Pi8 buds are the latest version of B&W’s flagship buds. Previous versions performed well, but with niggles; this time, B&W has nailed it. It’s redesigned the buds to look sleek and stylish and, more importantly, to fit incredibly well. They sit snugly with well-distributed weight and real design consideration behind them.

Now, onto the two things that matter most: sound and ANC. If sound is your top priority, these are the buds to beat. They deliver an impressively high level of detail and dynamism across genres. Turning on ANC doesn’t degrade the audio quality either – it stays feeling like it’s from a renowned hi-fi brand. Thanks to the improved fit and seal, the ANC is also very strong – not far off the best we’ve tested, with near-silence that only a few rivals can top.

Beyond that, you get premium features here too, including something very unusualy: the case doubles as an audio re-transmitter so you can plug the earbuds into wired audio sources (meaning you can use them with in-flight entertainment systems, or locked-down work laptops).

There are on-ear controls, but note you’ll have to choose between being able to switch ANC profiles or having on-ear volume controls when setting them up, which is annoying. All in all, these are a seriously accomplished pair of earbuds. One of the best for ANC and our top pick if you want both excellent noise cancellationandoutstanding sound.

The best noise-cancelling earbuds for features

Technics EAH-AZ100 in-ear headphones on a white surface

Technics EAH-AZ100 in-ear headphones, one facing up and the other facing down, on a white surfaceTechnics EAH-AZ100 earbuds in black, on a beige background, held in a handRear of Technics EAH-AZ100 in-ear headphones carry case, showing USB-C charging port

8. Technics EAH-AZ100

The best noise-cancelling earbuds for features

Specifications

Weight:5.9g (earbuds); 42g (charging case)

Frequency response:20Hz – 40kHz

Drivers:10mm free-edge dynamic

Battery life:12 hours (earbuds, ANC off); 17 hours (charging case)

Reasons to buy

+Assertive, balanced and convincing sound
+Extensive specification
+Great comfort and ergonomics
+Look and feel the money’s worth

Reasons to avoid

-Distinct difference between ‘ANC on’ and ‘ANC off’ sound
-Battery life is ‘good’ rather than ‘great’
-Can be bettered for noise-cancellation

BUY THEM IF

You’re a multitasker:There’s world-first triple-device multipoint connectivity here, which is super convenient and ideal if you like to move between devices as you work.

✅ You want top sound:Packed with features, yes, but the audio quality is also excellent with an assertive and balanced sound.

DON’T BUY THEM IF

❌ You want long-lasting buds:The battery life here isn’t bad, but it’s nothing special. And it’s disappointing for long flights, listening all day at work or into the night.

❌ You want the best ANC:Noise-cancelling here is very capable (it’s why these buds are in this guide), but you can do better if you want near-silence.

The Technics EAH-AZ100 were released in 2025 and are an update on Technics’ much lauded EAH-AZ80 buds that came before them. They look, feel and sound premium with solid ANC, but it’s their features that earn them a place in this guide.

We’ve got triple-point connectivity here, allowing you to seamlessly connect to three devices at once, extra voice enhancement tech for calls and a ‘magnetic fluid’ driver that Technics says results in better low-frequency response and less distortion throughout the frequency range. The buds use Bluetooth 5.3 for wireless and there’s compatibility for SBC, AAC, LDAC and LC3 codecs – something for everyone. You should get a solid 7 to 8 hours of playback time from the buds themselves, with a decent one-and-a-half further charges. The buds also work with Qi-certified charging pads, too.

The Technics EAH-AZ100 may be our top pick for features, but they also look excellent and comfort is impressive, thanks to a smaller and lighter design on previous models. They sounded engaging, exciting and thoroughly musical during our testing, more than capable of giving the high-end buds a run for their money. The EAH-AZ100s are, of course, on this list because they offer good ANC, which isn’t best-in-class, but is impressive.

However, although ANC here is solid, we’d recommend you keep it switched off if you want the best quality audio. Yes, this is a shame, but for some reason the beautifully-handled low frequencies lose substance, which is why we didn’t award these buds the full five out of five stars in our review. Otherwise, however, you’re getting top-tier sound, a shopping list of features and great comfort.

The best noise-cancelling earbuds for sports

Powerbeats Pro 2 - Wireless Sports Earbuds - Beats

Bose

9. Beats Powerbeats Pro 2

The best noise-cancelling earbuds for sports

Specifications

Acoustic design:Closed

Weight:7g

Frequency response:Not stated

Drivers:9.5mm dual-layer driver

Battery life (on-board):Up to 10 hrs (buds), up to 45hr total

Reasons to buy

+Stuffed with features
+Very secure, light and comfortable
+Heart-rate tracking
+Head-tracked spatial audio

Reasons to avoid

-Not the most sonically agile
-Sound suffers with ANC off
-Bulky case
-Only IPX4 splash-proof

BUY THEM IF

✅ You want extremely secure earbuds:Into dancing? Gymnastics? Or just really intense workouts? These buds aren’t going anywhere.

✅ You want heart rate monitoring:If you’re not already keeping tabs on your ticker with a smartwatch or smart ring, these will do the job.

DON’T BUY THEM IF

Sound quality is a top priority:These buds don’t sound bad, not at all. But their audio doesn’t match the high standard of their features or design.

You want an open-ear design:They maylooklike one of the many pairs of open-ear models dominating the market right now, but the buds fit firmly in your canals.

We’ve reluctantly swapped out theBeats Fit Pro– our longtime “best for sports” pick – for the newer Beats Powerbeats Pro 2. And we say reluctantly because the Fit Pro are still an excellent choice, especially if you want a simple, secure in-ear design. But when it comes to high-intensity workouts – running, dancing, even gymnastics – the Powerbeats Pro 2 take the lead.

Why? They won’t budge once fitted and they come packed with some seriously impressive features, including head-tracked spatial audio, excellent battery life and a built-in heart rate monitor – which we found to be both accurate and genuinely useful. Now, if you’re already tracking your heart rate with a smartwatch or smart ring, you might not need this feature. But if you’re just looking for fitness-focused heart rate tracking without the commitment of 24/7 monitoring, it’s a great addition.

Stability is another major win. The Fit Pro are still rock solid, but the Powerbeats Pro 2 go a step further thanks to their in-ear fit and over-ear hook. In other words, these earbuds aren’t going anywhere. They also come in a few fun colors, which is always a nice bonus.

Sound-wise? They’re good, but not quite as premium as their features and design might suggest. The audio is energetic – almost too much at times – occasionally veering into tinniness. Of course, there’s active noise cancellation (ANC), otherwise they wouldn’t have made this list. It works well, but interestingly, turning it off makes the audio suffer even more.

The Powerbeats Pro 2 aren’t cheap, but if you’re going to take full advantage of their standout features – ANC, heart rate tracking, and rock-solid stability – they’re well worth the investment. Especially if you’ve never quite found earbuds that stay put during workouts.

The best noise-cancelling earbuds for battery lifeJBL Live Beam 3JBL Live Beam 3JBL Live Beam 3

10. JBL Live Beam 3

The best noise-cancelling earbuds for battery life

Specifications

Acoustic design:Closed

Weight:5g per earbud

Frequency response:20 Hz – 40 kHz

Drivers:10mm dynamic

Battery life (on-board):Up to 12 hrs (buds), up to 48hr total

Reasons to buy

+Excellent battery life
+Screen is fun and can be useful
+Audio quality is strong

Reasons to avoid

-Somewhat weak spatial audio profiles
-ANC is good, but beaten by class-leaders

BUY THEM IF

✅ You need long, reliable listening:The battery life here is truly exceptional at 48 hours in total, and up to 12 hours from the buds alone.

✅ You like cutting-edge tech:It has a cool screen on it, that you can put your own images onto, and with some useful controls! Do your friends have that? No. Exactly.

DON’T BUY THEM IF

You want top spatial audio:Spatial audio is here, but we weren’t impressed by the experience. You’ll find better elsewhere.

You don’t like the feel of in-ears:If you’re not sure in-ears are for you there are better options. These buds tend to sit further into your canal than rivals.

Many earbuds pack in great ANC, but that often leads to a big reduction in battery life. This is hard to avoid given how much power is needed to nix noise effectively, so if you’re looking for something that leans further towards the battery end of the balance, the JBL Live Beam 3 are our top choice. You’ll get long listening sessions, or just won’t have to worry about charging your buds as often.

The JBL Live Beam 3 boast a seriously impressive 12 hours of battery from the earbuds alone or 10 hours with ANC. The case then delivers three further charges, meaning total playback time is up to a best-in-class 48 hours. That’s impossible to beat, especially with good ANC, sound and design as well. In terms of additional features, you’ll also get great call handling, six EQ presets or the option to create your own, and strong noise cancellation. Adaptive ANC is on-board, which adjusts the level of cancellation based on your surroundings. There’s also a feature called Auto Compensation, which adjusts audio based on your ear canal. If you switch off Adaptive ANC, you get a slider offering seven different levels of noise-nixing power.

Use a compatible smartphone and fire up a track from Qobuz or Apple Music and you can take advantage of Sony’s LDAC tech for higher-quality Bluetooth. These tracks are beautifully replayed. That doesn’t mean other tracks don’t sound impressive here too. In our review, we wrote: “Want big, exuberant sound that knows when to deliver large, but also when to pull back just a little, allowing the detail to shine through? That’s the sonic recipe the JBL Beam 3 present.”

The earbuds fit securely and snugly. Our reviewer has small ears and found them easy to wear, although it is worth mentioning that they do sit quite far into your ear canal – maybe avoid these if you’re already a little unsure as to whether you want in-ears or not. The other major design point is that the case has a screen on it, which surprisingly doesn’t drain the battery. You can access some basic features here, like putting a photo on the screen or using it as a flashlight. It’s not as smart as say a smartwatch, but it’s a cool addition.

More noise-cancelling earbuds we’ve tested

AKG N5:With good audio, a solid feature set and an in-case USB-C dongle, it’s easy to see why we awarded these buds 4 out of 5 stars in ourAKG N5 review.However, they don’t quite make the cut for this guide because they’ve got a disappointing battery life as well as several design issues we just couldn’t look past considering the price.

Apple AirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation:More affordable than the AirPods Pro 2, and they have the same H2 chip powering them, but with an open-ear design instead of an in-ear some. Some will prefer this, but it means the sound and ANC aren’t atquitethe same high standard. In ourAirPods 4 with Active Noise Cancellation review, we said these are the best open earbuds for Apple fans – but we generally much prefer the AirPods Pro 2, which usually cost only a small amount more than these, but are better in most ways..

Creative Zen AirSXFI:As you’ll find in ourCreative Zen AirSXFI review, these buds boast exceptional stamina, lasting up to 39 hours. But the poor spatial audio and ambient profiles really let them down.

Earfun Air 2 NC:Look, they’re good. You’ve got some impressive ANC here for the price. But the design and ‘theater mode’ isn’t great, and they’re not the most detailed listen. If you’re on a budget, however, read ourEarfun Air 2 NC reviewand have at them.

Edifier Stax Spirit S10:If you’re looking for excellent sound, you’ll find it from these buds. However, the ANC isn’t great – soo they don’t deserve a spot in this guide. Do take a look at ourEdifier Stax Spirit S10 reviewthough if audio is your only priority.

Google Pixel Buds Pro 2:Battery life is good and they’re small and cute, but otherwise these Google buds were pretty disappointing all round. Read ourGoogle Pixel Buds Pro 2 reviewto find out why.

LGxboom Buds:We were very impressed with the bass output on off from these buds when we we tested them for ourLG xboom Buds review. But they’re not as sleek and aesthetically pleasing as rivals, with a sound we enjoyed but that needed a fair bit of tweaking too.

Noble FoKus Rex5:These earbuds really are one of a kind. They sound great, ANC is top and they’re finished to a very high standard. But they’re incredibly and expensive and they’re also just very,verygreen. If that’s your thing, take a look at our fullNoble FoKus Rex5 review.

OnePlus Buds Pro 3:In ourOnePlus Buds Pro 3 reviewyou’ll learn we enjoyed testing these buds, they deliver great sound and have impressive battery life. But they’re not quite good enough to beat the best buds in this guide.

Viaim RecDot:Here’s a different proposition from Viaim, buds packed with AI features that can record and transcribe, making meetings infinitely easier. Sound quality is good too, but as far as ANC goes they’re a little disappointing. Although they don’t beat the rivals in this list, we definitely recommend you take a closer look at ourViaim RecDot review,because if you want buds for productivity, transcription and meetings, it doesn’t get better than this.

Dell XPS 13 vs MacBook Air: which is the king of laptops?

With 2025 being an absolute stellar year for laptops, how do these two contenders stack up?Dell XPS 13 on a white background

Dell XPS 13

Price:Starts at $1,199.99 / £1,399 / AU$3,198.80
CPU:Up to Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
GPU:Intel Arc Graphics
RAM:Up to 32GB LPDDR5X
Screen:Up to 13.4-inch 3K (2880 x 1800) OLED, 60Hz
Storage:Up to 2TB SSD
Ports:2x Thunderbolt 4 USB-C
Wireless:Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4
Weight:2.7lbs / 1.21kg
Dimensions:11.6 x 7.8 x 0.58 inches / 29.5 x 19.9 x 1.48cm

Dell might be planning to rebrand the XPS line to ‘Dell Premium’, but the XPS 13 is still available and remains one of the brand’s best laptops.

Pros

  • Gorgeous 3K OLED screen
  • Best-in-class battery life
  • Strong overall performance
  • Copilot+ ready

Cons

  • Not enough ports
  • Touchpad and touch bar hurt accessibility

>>>X1W0D Battery for Dell XPS 13 7390 2-In-1

The Apple MacBook Air 15-inch (M2, 2023).

M4 MacBook Air 13-inch

Price:Starts at $999 / £999 / AU$1,699
CPU:Apple M4 (10-core)
GPU:Up to Integrated 10-core GPU
RAM:Up to 32GB unified memory
Screen:13.6-inch, 2560 x 1664 Liquid Retina display, 60Hz
Storage:Up to 2TB SSD
Ports:2x Thunderbolt 4 USB-C, 3.5mm headphone jack, MagSafe 3
Wireless:Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3
Weight:2.7 lbs / 1.24kg
Dimensions:11.97 x 8.46 x 0.44 inches / 30.4 x 21.5 x 1.13cm

Apple’s latest thin-and-light MacBook is the best yet, sporting the powerful new M4 chip and an upgraded design.

Pros

  • M4 chip delivers top-notch performance
  • Design is still the best
  • All-day battery life
  • Lower price

Cons

  • – Apple Intelligence is still a mixed bag

With some of the best laptops of 2025 hitting the scene recently, it can be hard to determine which one is right for you. WithDellreleasing a new and improved iteration of its powerfulDell XPS 13as well as Apple fighting for the laptop crown with itsM4 Macbook Air 13-inch, which one is the better device?

We’re pitting the 2025 editions of both devices against each other, being sure to consider a wide range of comparisons and use cases. From price to performance, from design to display, we’re covering it all.

also:A2389 Battery for Apple MacBook Air 13 inch (2020 Version)

Dell XPS 13 vs MacBook Air: Price

The Dell XPS 13 pictured on a white surface in front of a window with two potted plants.While both of these laptops are seemingly hitting the same nail when it comes to target audience based on specifications and design, the Macbook Air is a fair bit cheaper than the Dell XPS 13. With a starting price of $999 / £999 / AU$1,699, this is much more affordable than Dell’s asking price of $1,199.99 / £1,399 / AU$3,198.80, particularly in regions outside of the US.

It’s worth noting that these prices are for the lowest specification of each model with the Dell XPS 13 – our current top pick of thebest Dell laptops- going up to a whopping $2,349.99 / £2,634 / AU$4,899.40 whileApple’s effectively maxes out at $1,499 / £1,499 / AU$2,399 for relatively similar specifications.

  • Winner:MacBook Air

>>>90V7W Battery for Dell XPS 13 9343 9350 JD25G 5K9CP DIN02

Dell XPS 13 vs MacBook Air: Design

Apple MacBook Air 13-inch (M4) REVIEW

As expected from two of thebest laptops, both of these devices are absolutely stunning. The Dell XPS 13 comes packed into a lightweight, ultrathin chassis that looks fantastic and makes it simple to take absolutely anywhere with you without having to worry about your shoulders slowly starting to collapse under the weight of your laptop.

In our review, we found that the keyboard felt great to type on, though one downside is that the touchpad is ‘invisible’ – this poses an issue with accessibility as you can’t feel the difference between the palm rest and the actual touchpad. There is also a lack of ports on this laptop, with only 2 Thunderbolt 4 USB-C ports – you’ll likely be relying on Bluetooth for peripherals with this device.

In comparison, the Macbook Air also comes with a sleek and superb chassis which again looks breathtaking. It’s super light, weighing almost exactly the same as the XPS 13, making it a great option to pop in your backpack and take on the go with you. The Macbook Air is actually thinner than the Dell XPS 13, measuring in at 1.13cm to Dell’s 1.48cm – and while this sounds marginal, it’s enough to notice the difference.

While testing, we found that the keyboard was amazing to type on with great travel and response for a device so thin. The Macbook Air poses a similar issue when it comes to lack of ports, with only 2 Thunderbolt 4 USB-C ports, a 3.5mm headphone jack, and MagSafe 3 for charging. However, one point that ensures the Macbook Air wins this round is that you don’t have to lock off an entire Thunderbolt port for charging.

  • Winner:Macbook Air

Dell XPS 13 vs MacBook Air: Performance and display

The Dell XPS 13 pictured on a white surface in front of a window with two potted plants.

When using the Dell XPS 13, we were absolutely blown away, with it posing not a single issue during its entire testing period. It was fine for real-world usage, easily coping with the countless Chrome tabs we might have needed, and also held up exceptionally when being put through its paces during our benchmarking process. While the fans started whining during the 3DMark benchmarks, this is to be expected, and it remained silent during all other usage.

The screen on the Dell XPS 13 is the real ‘wow factor’ for this laptop. You get a top-spec 3K (2880 x 1800) InfinityEdgeOLEDtouch display which provides excellent picture quality and color range. Even when benchmarking, which results in some choppier frames, it still looked fantastic.

Similarly, the Macbook Air performed exceptionally well, from everyday productivity usage right down to intensive benchmarking. No matter what we threw at the system, it ran smoothly and with ease even down to playing AAA titles – something which would have been unimaginable on a Macbook even just a couple of years ago. Performance-wise, the base configuration edges out Dell’s laptop thanks to its superior iGPU, but it’s a close fight.

The Macbook Air display features a 13.6-inch Liquid Retina panel (Apple’s signature display type, found on most of thebest MacBooks and Macs) with 2560 x 1664 resolution and 500 nits of sustained brightness. It is brilliant for everything from gaming, down to content creation or even watching movies but the XPS 13’s OLED panel is certainly the better screen, so this one ends up coming out as a draw.

  • Winner:Tie

Dell XPS 13 vs MacBook Air: Battery life

Apple MacBook Air 13-inch (M4) REVIEW

While both devices deliver great battery life, one is just that much more exceptional. The Dell XPS 13 comes with a promise of 24-hour battery life and in our review we found that it delivered just that, giving us 23 hours and 26 mins of usage in our batterymap movie test. This laptop will easily see you through a full workday and then some, and also charges super fast going from empty to 80% in an hour while not being used.

On the other hand, the Macbook Air claims up to 18 hours of battery life and delivered just under 15 hours in our active benchmarking. While in theory this sounds dwarfed when compared to the Dell XPS 13, it’s still pretty amazing. Again, this device will easily last you a full workday and then some, but it just doesn’t quite live up to the competition here. Another downside is that this device doesn’t charge as quickly either, taking 90 mins to reach 50% charge.

  • Winner:Dell XPS 13

Which one should you buy?

The Dell XPS 13 pictured on a white surface in front of a window with two potted plants.

Although the MacBook Air technically won more categories, it’s hard to determine a clear overall winner when it comes to these devices. While the Dell XPS 13 takes home the crown when it comes to battery life and display quality, the Macbook Air does come in at a significantly lower price point and also boasts more ports and a thinner design.

While both of these laptops are absolutely fantastic options for those looking for a new device whether it be for work or pleasure, which one you pick up will be based on your needs and how much you’re willing to spend. If you prefer Windows and want something that will last you days without needing a charge, then the Dell XPS 13 is likely the one for you. On the other hand, if you’re hoping to save some money where you can but still need a high-end device, then the Macbook Air will probably suit you better.